Practitioner
John Martin
Legend of Dance
Why They Matter
Martin matters to dance because he helped create the conditions in which movement could be discussed as an autonomous art in the American general press. His reviews, lectures and books offered audiences a vocabulary for modern dance and supplied emerging choreographers with sustained public attentio
Known For
Biography
John Joseph Martin was born on 2 June 1893 in Louisville, Kentucky. Before becoming a critic, he worked as an actor, publicist and editor in Louisville and New York, served during the First World War and joined the Chicago Little Theatre, where he married Hettie Mick and encountered the theatrical ideas of Konstantin Stanislavsky. That emphasis on action arising from inner impulse later shaped how he understood modern dance as embodied expression rather than decoration.
In the 1920s, American newspapers typically assigned dance performances to music or theater critics. The growth of concert dance—including the work of Ruth St. Denis, Ted Shawn and Martha Graham—created a need for criticism attentive to movement itself. In 1927, *The New York Times* hired Martin as its first dedicated dance critic. His assignment was institution-building as much as reviewing: he had to develop standards, teach readers how to look and argue that choreography deserved an independent critical vocabulary.
Martin became closely associated with the emergence of American modern dance. He wrote extensively about Graham and her contemporaries and proposed concepts such as "metakinesis," through which a spectator responds bodily and emotionally to performed movement. Lectures at the New School for Social Research and Bennington College expanded his newspaper work into public education. His advocacy was historically influential, but it also shaped the canon unevenly: his preferences elevated some artists while marginalizing other practices and later generations.
His lectures became *The Modern Dance* in 1933, a book examining form, technique, movement experience and relations between dance and the other arts. Later publications included *An Introduction to the Dance*, *John Martin's Book of the Dance*, *America Dancing* and studies that broadened from modern dance to ballet and dance history. Across these works, Martin treated spectatorship as active labor: the viewer was not simply consuming spectacle but responding through cultivated kinesthetic attention.
Martin remained at *The New York Times* until retiring in 1962. He then taught at the University of California, Los Angeles until 1967, returned to New York and moved to Saratoga Springs in 1971 to share a home with choreographer Zachary Solov. He continued writing, including a biography of Ruth Page, and preserved a substantial archive of correspondence, programs, photographs, scrapbooks and criticism. Martin died in Saratoga Springs on 19 May 1985. His long tenure created a model of the newspaper dance critic as historian, interpreter and public educator, though his influence also established boundaries around which artists and forms would enter the historical record.
Legacy & Impact
Martin matters to dance because he helped establish the conditions in which movement could be discussed as an autonomous art in the American general press. His reviews, lectures and books gave audiences a vocabulary for modern dance and supplied emerging choreographers with sustained public attention. That power was double-edged: his championing helped legitimize an art form while his tastes shaped which artists entered the mainstream historical record. His papers at the New York Public Library make it possible to study both his pioneering contribution and the limits of the canon he helped construct.
Explore More Legends
Discover the dancers, teachers, choreographers, and cultural icons who shaped how the world moves.
Keep the thread going
Dance history, technique, and the occasional rabbit hole — in your inbox. Thoughtful, infrequent, unsubscribe anytime.
Free. No spam. One click to leave.